The Contents of the ASA Bulletin, Volume 43, Issue 3 (2025)

ASAB

 

In his message, The Lame Duck’s Last Quack, outgoing ASA President Felix DASSER reflects on a rewarding six-year tenure leading the ASA, and expresses optimism for the association’s future despite emerging challenges affecting Switzerland’s arbitration landscape such as foreign attacks on arbitration by the European Court of Justice, Swiss sanctions and current U.S. attacks on the Swiss export industry.

 

Articles

Werner JAHNEL and Stefanie PFISTERER present the Supplemental Swiss Rules for Trust, Estate and Foundation (TEF) Disputes which entered into force on 1 July 2025, Switzerland further consolidates its position as a leading jurisdiction for the arbitration of private-wealth disputes. These new rules which supplement the Swiss Rules of Internal Arbitration offer a suitable framework tailored to the needs of high-net-worth families as well as trusts and foundations. By addressing the procedural and substantive complexities inherent in international trust, estate, and foundation matters, the TEF Rules are a welcomed development to increase the use of arbitration in this field. (Werner JAHNEL, Stefanie PFISTERER, Arbitration for Private-Wealth Disputes – The New Paradigm under the Swiss Rules.)

Users of international arbitration experience document production as a burdensome, costly, and all too often ineffective exercise. Drawing on an analysis of various legal traditions and existing instruments, a working group of the ASA User Council has taken the initiative to call for a robust readjustment of current procedures and has put together a whitepaper offering guidance on the key standards defining current practice – relevance and materiality – and the proposed measures aiming at keeping arbitration efficient and attractive that can be applied by parties, counsel, arbitral tribunals, and institutions. (ASA User Council, “Taming the Beast” – A Whitepaper on Document Production.)

Matthias LEEMANN, Judicial Law Clerk and Scientific Advisor at the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, addresses the role of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in shaping the framework of international arbitration in Switzerland, its limited – yet decisive – powers of review and its restrictive approach to substantive public policy, which contribute to reinforcing Switzerland’s standing as one of the leading seats of arbitration. This article provides insights into the Court’s inner workings and how it typically handles selected procedural matters, such as the language of the proceedings, advance on court fees, suspensive effect or interim measures, standing, nova and the requirement  that setting aside applications be sufficiently substantiated, offering invaluable guidance to practitioners on setting aside proceedings in Switzerland. (Matthias LEEMANN, Insights from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court.)

 

Swiss Case Law

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Become a contributor Contact Editorial Guidelines