A news publication could not rely on First Amendment protection for its use of a mark even though it made no attempt to parody the original.
A news publication named with a common English language…
The parodist could not rely on First Amendment protection because it used the famous sneakers as a source identifier.
The maker of a sneaker that parodied a famous brand of skateboard-friendly kicks…
The murals were merely hidden from public view, not modified or destroyed.
A law school that covered up two controversial murals with acoustic panels in order to hide them from public view did not…
A long legal battle over the status of “the greatest of all cheeses,” comes to an apparent end.
A federal court in Virginia correctly relied on standards of identity written by the Food and Drug…
A district court was too hasty in rejecting the safe distance rule.
A federal district court in Detroit must reconsider its decision to allow the Indian maker of an off-road vehicle to release a…
Pepsi earns reversal of pretrial order that would have required it to stop marketing a new Mountain Dew product.
A federal district court was wrong to enjoin Pepsi from continuing to market a canned…
Traditional limitations on trademarking a personal name give way to free speech interests when it comes to prominent public officials.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board violated the First…
A district court rightly enjoined a Wyoming trial lawyer training program from purporting to be the “true board” of a competing program from which it had recently split, the U.S. Court of Appeals for…
Although the federal court stayed its action to allow a state court to determine the scope of certain licenses, the stay could not be reviewed on appeal because it did not effectively end the federal…