UPC - Provisional Application Period enters into force

search-result-placeholder.jpg

Breaking News:

According to the EU Council's Website, Austria has deposited its instrument of ratification yesterday, which means that the Period for Provisional Application begins today.

Let's see when it ends. Good luck to the Preparatory Committee with the numerous preparation activities that must now be started.

Comments (10)
Your email address will not be published.
default-avatar.png
Andre Frans
January 19, 2022 AT 4:15 PM

How to declare a treaty into force when the condition to declare it into force have not been met. So no more signing ceremony to overcome Brexit? BTW it's not the European Commission website, but the Council website.

thorsten-bausch-2024
Thorsten Bausch response to Andre Frans
January 19, 2022 AT 4:31 PM

Thank you for spotting the error in the origin of the website. I have corrected the post. Otherwise, the treaty has obviously not yet been declared into force, but the Preparatory Committee will work towards making this possible within a year (or even 8 months, in the most optimistic scenario) and Germany has already concluded its internal preparations to ratify as soon as the Preparatory Committee is ready.

default-avatar.png
Concerned observer response to thorstenbausch
January 19, 2022 AT 5:18 PM

Thorsten, I think that the "Treaty" to which Andre refers is the PAP ... which allegedly HAS entered into force. I too had expected a signing ceremony for a "Declaration on the authentic interpretation of Art. 3 of the PAP-Protocol", which was supposed to take place "in the margins of a future COREPER meeting". Perhaps a signing ceremony will still happen, though there is no mention of such in connection with this week's COREPER meeting (https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/mpo/2022/1/coreper-1-(313748)/). However, even if one accepts the rather dubious premise that the crystal-clear wording of Art. 3 of the PAP-Protocol can be given an alternative meaning, it is far from clear whether it is permissible to rely upon a purported "authentic interpretation" that has not yet been formally approved by the Participating Member States. We shall have to wait and see what the Member States agree regarding reallocation of the duties of the London branch of the central division. I very much hope that it is more legally defensible than what has happened with the PPI and PAP.

default-avatar.png
Extraneous Attorney
January 19, 2022 AT 6:11 PM

It is still not crystal-clear to me how the conditions for entry into force of the Protocol on provisional application can have been met, since the United Kingdom has withdrawn its consent to be bound by that Protocol. Perhaps the Preparatory Committee will helpfully explain how that can be.

default-avatar.png
Andre Frans response to Extraneous Attorney
January 20, 2022 AT 10:49 AM

"Perhaps the Preparatory Committee will helpfully explain how that can be." Nope, they won't be of any help. Maybe a question to the CJEU would help?

Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community! Contact Editorial Guidelines