Straßenbaumaschine/Road Construction Device, Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), 31 March 2009
March 31, 2009
A patent infringement action may not be rejected on the grounds that a feature of the asserted patent claim seems to be unclear in its technical meaning. A lack of clarity may only give reason to limit the feature to the narrowest reasonable meaning.
The full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community!
Contact Editorial Guidelines
