Silence at the EPO after angry outburst president António Campinos
May 17, 2022
The industrial actions at the European Patent Office, which were organised by trade union SUEPO with the support of the Central Staff Committee (CSC), go into their fourth month next week.
The main reason for discontent with the EPO management is a new salary adjustment procedure which, according to SUEPO, 'causes a disastrous immediate and long-term loss of purchasing power and denies the massive efforts made by EPO staff during the last two pandemic years.” In a letter circulated among EPO staff it specified the “inflation in the Netherlands of 11.2% and in Germany of 7.8% over the last 12 months accounts for far more than a double step reward (on average 1 step equals 2%). Less than 60% of eligible staff (actually less than 50% of all staff) may receive a single step let alone a double step this year. This is the worst year in the career of EPO staff which comes at the time when staff worked diligently through the worst pandemic of the century and the worst inflation since the EPO inception.'

The social tensions at the EPO led to an unprecedented outburst of anger of president António Campinos last month. In a meeting on 26 April 2022, described as ‘abysmal’ by the CSC, he reportedly ‘used foul language throughout (…) and insulted most of the speakers. The CSC members were not just interrupted but prevented from speaking multiple times (…)’ up to a point where the EPO president told CSC members: ‘You will never have such a nice person being the f***ing President for the next fifty f***ing years. So you wake up and make agreements with me, or you never will for your f***ing life.’
This is at least what the CSC wrote to staff. In the official EPO report there is only a vague and short reference to what happened: ‘The latest General Consultative Committee (GCC) meeting took place on Tuesday 26 April. Unfortunately, the meeting was less constructive than expected, with some issues creating tension at times. Three topics, previously discussed productively in joint working groups or previous exchanges, were presented to the GCC.’ The rest of the report is dedicated to the Young Professionals programme and secondment of national experts, among others.
Kluwer IP Law contacted the EPO for a reaction on the CSC’s letter, asking expressly if it could confirm or deny whether the CSC's report was accurate and correct, including the description of the behaviour and texts of president Campinos. But a spokesperson replied the EPO didn’t wish to comment.
Silence so far also from Josef Kratochvíl, elected Chairman of the Administrative Council, who was contacted by this author about the occurrences of 26 April as well.
Caramba
"Silence so far also from Josef Kratochvíl, elected Chairman of the Administrative Council, who was contacted by this author about the occurrences of 26 April " The matter is rather simple: either Mr Campinos misbehaved or he did not. I bet that if he had not, after SUEPO's report the EPO would have immediately accused SUEPO of manipulating but they refrain from it. Guess why. Mr Kratochvíl knows perfectly well that Mr Campinos misbehaved.
Silence Dogood
Actually, if we read the president's words removing the fuc***, it says: "You will never have such a nice person being the President for the next fifty years. So you wake up and make agreements with me, or you never will for your life." Isn't this an invitation for negotiation? Sounds like he has made some offers, and the counterpart is sleeping. My question is, who is sitting with the president to make deals, and to whom does this person report? After some years with the present president, what has this CSC member achieve? The CSC "boss" should also check on the member's ability to reach a deal. If the member can't manage, isn't it time to find someone else?
A. Nonymous
It seems that Silence Dogood has more information than I have, they may (or may not) be right. However, does anyone for one second believe that there is any negotiation? Silence Dogood writes that it sounds like some offers have been made, I am wondering whether they are of the "take or leave" variety, or genuine offers in the course of a negotiation. The Wikipedia page on negotiation starts with this: "Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties with the intention of reaching a beneficial outcome regarding one or more issues where a conflict exists." and later mentions: "The degree to which the negotiating parties trust each other to implement the negotiated solution is a major factor in determining whether negotiations are successful or not."
Attentive Observer
To Silence Dogood, What is there to negotiate with a person who has systematically worsen the conditions of employment and wants to continue on this track? The whole financial study taken as pretext for blocking salaries and reducing benefits was an absolute scam. Just an example: the EPO would get any renewal fees for the next years. All actions of this president were to lower working conditions! Negotiation means discussing matters seriously and not merely take it or leave it. You take it as I am the boss is his actual attitude. And vulgarity has never helped a cause! Let’s be realistic!
Joris Bohnson
The EPO can go to hell. Scrap the European Patent and let's all go national! Phoaar!