Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

2842 results available

search-result-placeholder.jpg
Peter Burgers  (Brinkhof)
Boston Scientific v. Medinol, Supreme Court (Hoge Raad), 06 March 2009
March 06, 2009

The Dutch Supreme Court stated that the patentee still has an interest in this supreme appeal proceeding after amendment of the patent pursuant to Articles 105a-c EPC 2000 subsequent to coming into…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Brian Cordery  (Bristows)
Lundbeck v. Generics, Court of Appeal Civil Division (House of Lords of England and Wales), 25 February 2009
February 25, 2009

The patent in suit contains claims for the (+)enantiomer of citalopram and a method for its resolution from the racemate (the diol method). The Defendants appealed a decision of the Court of Appeal…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozlowska  (Allen & Overy)
Spatial connector, Administrative Court of Voivodeship Warsaw (Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie), 25 February 2009
February 25, 2009

In this case the Court holds that documents and explanations relating to a patent application should be corrected or changed at the request of the Polish Patent Office within a fixed time period and…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Sam Tuxford
Kelly & Ors v. GE Healthcare, High Court of England and Wales (Patents Court) (High Court of England and Wales (Patents Court)), 11 February 2009
February 11, 2009

Two research scientists, involved with the synthesis of a compound which formed the basis of a patented heart imaging agent, brought what is the first ever successful action under Section 40 of the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Mark van Gardingen  (Brinkhof)
Novartis v. Johnson & Johnson, District Court The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), 11 February 2009
February 11, 2009

Lack of novelty by re-working prior art requires that the re-works must inevitably lead to results falling within the claim of the patent at issue. If choices have to be made for the re-working…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Ivan Marinov  (Delchev & Partners)
Yanko Tsv. A. v. Bulgarian Patent Office, Supreme Administrative Court (Върховен Административен Съд), 10 February 2009
February 10, 2009

Mr Yanko Tsv. A. filed an application with the Bulgarian Patent Office (BPO) for the grant of a patent for an ‘Active solar heating system’. The BPO dismissed the application as the Expert Department…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Lars de Haas  (V.O.)
Ex parte Nintendo, European Patent Office (Appeals Court), 6 February 2009
February 06, 2009

The Board reversed a refusal of the patent application for lack of technical contribution. The underlying decision had expressed the view that the idea of making chance encounters depend on time was…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Peter Burgers  (Brinkhof)
Sahajanand v. Angiotech, Court of Appeal The Hague (Gerechtshof Den Haag), 27 January 2009
January 27, 2009

In this judgment the Court of Appeal considers the appellant's claim for invalidation of the patent inadmissible as he did not call the co-proprietor of the patent to join the proceedings. While…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozlowska  (Allen & Overy)
Data carrier, Administrative Court of Voivodeship Warsaw (Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie), 26 January 2009
January 26, 2009

In this case the Court confirmed beyond any doubt that the Polish Patent Office is not an administrative body that shall automatically approve patents granted by the European Patent Office. However,…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Mark Einerhand
CSL Behring v. Common Services Agency – insufficiency, European Patent Office (Appeals Court), 23 January 2009
January 23, 2009

The degree of effectiveness of the invention (here: the removal of prion proteins) is an issue related to the technical problem solved by the invention. This is to be considered when assessing…

  • Read more
2831 - 2840 of 2842 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 143
  • ...
  • 282
  • 283
  • 284
  • 285
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.