As readers know well, one of the issues carefully considered by courts around the world when examining inventive activity is the qualifications and experience of the experts designated by the partiesā¦
As the European Commission has recently asked organizations to submit comments to the Commission consultation on an effective insolvency framework within the EU (āConsultationā) and the issue is alsoā¦
The UK's Intellectual Property Office has published a statement on the future of IPĀ law after the Brexit vote of 23 June 2016, saying there will be āno immediate changesā regarding the Unitary Patentā¦
The end of July traditionally brings a flurry of patents judgments from the English Courts. This year was no exception, hence the large number of posts in the last few days. Among this yearās flurryā¦
by Gregory Bacon
The English courts are not averse to determining disputes concerning foreign rights, including intellectual property rights. Readers will no doubt be aware of the recent case betweenā¦
by Rachel Mumby
Those readers who are unfamiliar with the excessively optimistic outlook of Mr Wilkins Micawber in Charles Dickenās novel David Copperfield, would be forgiven for having had to lookā¦
Analysing whether, if the UK ratifies the UPC, further participation in the Unitary Patent system might be possible and on what legal basis. That is the main objective of a group of patentā¦
A federal trial court erroneously concluded that patent defendant Suunto Oy lacked minimum contacts with the State of Delaware to support the assertion of specific personal jurisdiction in a patentā¦
Contrary to established case law and practice, the Higher Regional Court of Vienna stayed preliminary injunction proceedings in a patent infringement matter and conducted an oral hearing. Theā¦
As readers know well, over the last few years courts around Europe have handed down several ground-breaking decisions on the scope of "second medical use" claims and, in particular, the activitiesā¦