Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

2846 results available

search-result-placeholder.jpg
Lars de Haas  (V.O.)
T144/09 Traction sheave elevator, European Patent Office (EPO Board of Appeal), 4 May 2011
July 30, 2011

The board refused to find a set of claims filed with the grounds of appeal admissible, because it concluded from the circumstances that the proprietor had deliberately refused to file these claims…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Gustav Bacher  (Szecskay)
Rampiril, Supreme Court of Hungary (Legfelsöbb Bíróság), 17 September 2010
July 30, 2011

Hungarian Supreme Court's decision on conditions for granting supplementary protection certificates (SPC) under the transitional provisions of the Accession Treaty. The Supreme Court held that the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Thorsten Bausch  (Hoffmann Eitle)
Federal Court of Justice does not bite into Tooth Cleaning patent: A combination of elements that are adapted so as to jointly serve a certain purpose, is not anticipated by a reference that merely discloses these elements without their functional adaptat
July 29, 2011

The Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) in Germany has held in its recent “Dentalgerätesatz” decision FCJ.5.4.2011that claim 1 of EP 892 625 is novel since it claimed a new functional adaptation of…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Miquel Montañá  (Clifford Chance)
A SHED OF LIGHT IN THE DARK: First Spanish decision admitting post-grant claim limitations under article 138.3 of CPE 2000
July 28, 2011

The Commercial Court of Granada has just handed down a Decision dated 6 July 2011 which, as far as the author is aware, has admitted for the first time a post-grant claim limitation under article 138…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Simon Holzer  (MLL Legal Ltd.)
Swiss Federal Supreme Court: Payment of Court Fees and Reimbursement of Plaintiff's Attorneys' Fees by Alleged Patent Infringer because of Defendant's Contradictory Conduct and Plaintiff's Good Faith
July 25, 2011

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court held in a recent decision that the Swiss company Teva Pharma AG had to bear the court costs and reimburse Novartis's attorneys' fees in preliminary injunction…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Eike Schaper
SPCs and Combination Products
July 22, 2011

Combination products (containing two or more active ingredients) raise difficult questions with respect to supplementary protection certificates (SPCs). Can a SPC be based on the market authorisation…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Miquel Montañá  (Clifford Chance)
Supreme court hands down landmark judgment on doctrine of equivalents and trips
July 14, 2011

On 4 July 2011, the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court published a judgment dated 10 May 2011 approved en banc (i.e. by the full Court) shedding light on two important points: (i) the scope of the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Brian Cordery  (Bristows)
Cephalon v Orchid – no infringement on purposive construction
July 12, 2011

In the recent case of Cephalon v Orchid [2011] EWHC 1591, the UK Court held that three patents relating to the drug modafinil, used to treat sleep disorders such as narcolepsy, were not infringed and…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Thomas Musmann  (Rospatt Osten Pross)
Enabling Disclosure – A New Rule of Reason for Patentability?
July 08, 2011

This is to report on a new tendency in the jurisdiction of the Federal Patent Court to use the prerequisite of enabling disclosure (Art. 83 EPC) as an unpredictable rule of reason for patentability.…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Thorsten Bausch  (Hoffmann Eitle)
Lack of Clarity of Granted Claims in EPO Opposition Proceedings
July 07, 2011

During EPO opposition proceedings, patentees have historically been able to avoid discussing clarity by combining granted claims rather than using the description as basis for amendments. The…

  • Read more
2491 - 2500 of 2846 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 143
  • ...
  • 248
  • 249
  • 250
  • 251
  • 252
  • ...
  • 285
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.