Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

190 results available

search-result-placeholder.jpg
Peter Reap (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Prospectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, Nos. 2015-1016, 26 May 2016
June 02, 2016

The federal district court in Tyler, Texas, correctly construed the term “mountable” in a patent for a digital picture frame asserted by Profectus Technology against the manufacturers and sellers of…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Peter Reap (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA, Trade Secrets: Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, No. 15-20184, 12 May 2016
June 01, 2016

The federal district court in Houston did not abuse its discretion in enforcing a forum selection clause between Wellogix, on one side, and SAP America, Inc. and SAP AG (collectively, “SAP”) on the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
newgenblog, Mark Engstrom (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: In re Rhoads, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1972, 4 May 2016
May 13, 2016

Substantial evidence supported the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that a skilled artisan would have been motivated to combine three prior art references to obtain methods for using a smart…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Mark Engstrom (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Genius Electronic Optical Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1695, 27 April 2016
May 04, 2016

A federal district court did not err in finding that Genius Electronic Optical, a supplier of camera lenses for Apple’s iPhone and iPad products, did not induce the infringement of five camera-lens…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Jody Coultas (CCH)
USA, Trade secrets: Steiner v. Lewmar, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, Nos. 143817cv(L), 7 March 2016
April 20, 2016

A district court properly denied a plaintiff attorney fees after it had accepted an offer of judgment to settle claims for damages and equitable relief, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City has…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Mark Engstrom (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: In re Hubbell Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1222, 7 April 2016
April 20, 2016

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err in affirming a patent examiner’s obviousness rejection of 23 claims of a Hubbell patent titled “Convertible electrical device cover and method for…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Cheryl Beise (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. International Trade Commission, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2014-1527, 10 November 2015
April 06, 2016

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has decided not to grant requests for and en banc rehearing of an earlier panel decision holding that the International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Brian Cordery, Andrew Bowler (Bristows)
Report from the Fordham Conference (2)
April 04, 2016

Friday 1st April was the final day of the Fordham conference. This short report summarises one of the more interesting patent-focused sessions which dealt with second medical use issues. Brian…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Report from the Fordham Conference (1)
April 01, 2016

For 2016, the Fordham Conference has returned to its home on the Upper West side of Manhattan. In the meantime, the Institute has been rebuilt and the shabby-chic has been replaced with a state of…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Jody Coultas (CCH)
USA: In re Ray Smith and Amanda Tears Smith, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1664, 10 March 2016
March 23, 2016

A patent application was properly denied on the basis that it covered the abstract idea of rules for playing a wagering game and used conventional steps of shuffling and dealing a standard deck of…

  • Read more
111 - 120 of 190 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • ...
  • 19
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.