Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

190 results available

search-result-placeholder.jpg
Peter Reap  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-2037, 14 April 2017
April 20, 2017

The federal district court in Tyler, Texas, correctly denied Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L.’s ("Core Wireless’s") motion for judgment as a matter of law that Apple infringed a claim of a Core…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Thomas Long  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Google Inc. v. SimpleAir, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1901, 28 March 2017
April 09, 2017

In an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding challenging a SimpleAir patent that described a method of transmitting data to remote computing devices, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err in…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Thomas Musmann  (Rospatt Osten Pross)
Eli Lilly v. Canada – The First Final Award Ever on Patents and International Investment Law
April 04, 2017

Dr. Simon Klopschinski rospatt osten pross – Intellectual Property Rechtsanwälte In the international investment arbitration of Eli Lilly v. Canada the arbitral tribunal rendered on March 16, 2017…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Cheryl Beise  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1854, 17 March 2017
March 22, 2017

The federal district court in Wilmington, Delaware, did not abuse its discretion in finding that Bayer CropScience’s infringement suit against agrochemical rival Dow AgroSciences over soybean gene…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Elisabeth C. Pope  (CCH)
USA: Meiresonne v. Google, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1755, 7 March 2017
March 09, 2017

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err when it concluded that the claims of a patent relating to the use of descriptive text combined with a rollover viewing area in the user interface of an…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Jody Coultas  (CCH)
USA: Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc. v. Apple Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-2038, 17 February 2017
February 24, 2017

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err in finding that certain claims of Slot Speaker Technologies, Inc.’s sound reproduction system patent were invalid as obvious in light of prior art,…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Thomas Long  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Shire Development, LLC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1785, 10 February 2017
February 15, 2017

Pharmaceuticals company Watson’s proposed generic version of competitor Shire’s brand-name mesalamine LIALDA® did not satisfy the requirements for a Markush group claimed by a Shire patent, the U.S.…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Peter Reap  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Trading Technologies International v. CQG, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1616, 18 January 2017
January 25, 2017

Two patents directed to a method for the electronic trading of stocks, bonds, futures, and options asserted by Trading Technologies International (TTI) against the CQG companies were not directed to…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Mark Engstrom  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
USA: Sonix Technology Company, Ltd. v. Publications International, Ltd, 5 January 2017
January 11, 2017

A federal district court erred in ruling that 34 claims of a patent on a system and method of using a graphical indicator were invalid as indefinite, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Jody Coultas  (CCH)
USA: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., Supreme Court of the United States, No. 15-777, 6 December 2016
January 04, 2017

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded a Federal Circuit decision upholding a jury’s award of damages to Apple Inc. based on infringement of its design patents by Samsung…

  • Read more
91 - 100 of 190 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • ...
  • 19
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.