Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

278 results available

search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Cephalon v Orchid – no infringement on purposive construction
July 12, 2011

In the recent case of Cephalon v Orchid [2011] EWHC 1591, the UK Court held that three patents relating to the drug modafinil, used to treat sleep disorders such as narcolepsy, were not infringed and…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
English Patent Court grants temporary restraining order against Teva on short notice
June 29, 2011

On 20 June 2011, Floyd J. granted a temporary restraining order preventing restraining Teva UK Limited (and two distribution companies, “Phoenix” and “AAH”) from advertising, offering for sale,…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Hargreaves Review
June 06, 2011

The Hargreaves Review, or to refer to it by its official title, “A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth” by Professor Ian Hargreaves, was commissioned by the UK coalition government in 2010 to…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Sam Tuxford for
Schutz v. Werit, Court of Appeal Civil Division, 29 March 2011
May 26, 2011

The Court of Appeal overturned a decision of the High Court and held that the act of replacing Shutz's bottles in Shutz's outer protective cages with Werit's bottles constituted ’ making’  products…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
A lack of time does not make an invention non-obvious
May 20, 2011

In the recent case of Merck v Teva (decision of 8 April [2011] EWCA Civ 382), the English Court of Appeal confirmed that when considering the question of inventive step in light of prior art, it did…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
English Patents Court disapproving of EPO’s approach to assessment of novelty: Lundbeck v Norpharma and Infosint
May 05, 2011

As previously discussed, the English Court of Appeal has clearly stated its support for judicial collaboration facilitating de facto harmonisation of patent law in Europe (Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Shedding Further Light on Obviousness – the Schering/Richter case
April 19, 2011

In a judgment dated 17 March 2011 reported at [2011] EWHC 583 (Pat), the English High Court has upheld certain claims of two patents (deriving from the same ultimate parent application) for the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Sam Tuxford for
Virgin v. Delta, Court of Appeal Civil Division, 23 February 2011
April 12, 2011

The Court of Appeal allowed Virgin's appeal and overturned the decision of the High Court which had granted Delta's application for summary judgment on the basis that it was wrong to say Virgin had…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Making or repair?
April 06, 2011

In the recent case of Schütz v Werit, the Court of Appeal examined the boundary between repair and making under the English implementation of Article 25 of the Community Patent Convention. The…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Sam Tuxford for
Dr Reddy's and Eli Lilly - CoA re. costs, Court of Appeal Civil Division (Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division), 18 December 2009
March 11, 2011

If a party decides to participate in another party's challenge to a patent so it may share in the benefits of a victory, it may well be ordered to share the costs burden of losing. Actavis was…

  • Read more
241 - 250 of 278 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 14
  • ...
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.