Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

14 results available

search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Åse Røynestad Konsmo (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Active Brands AS v. Finor AS and Fischer Sports GmbH, District Court of Olso, 14-150510TVI-OTIR/04, 3 March 2015
December 09, 2015

The Oslo District Court held that the climbing skin concept "Fisher Easy Skin" for ski-grip on a snow base launched by the defendants Finor AS and Fischer Sports GmbH (hereinafter jointly "Fisher"),…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Electromagnetic Geoservices AS v. PGS, District Court of Olso, No. 324 454, 13 February 2015
September 01, 2015

The Oslo District Court invalidated the Norwegian patent NO 324 454 B3 on a method intended for the direct detection of oil and gas in subsea reservoirs using electromagnetic measurements due to lack…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Genentech v. Hospira, Court of Appeal of Borgarting, 24 April 2015
July 08, 2015

In its decision 24 April 2015, the Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld a decision from the Oslo District Court revoking Genentech's Norwegian patent NO 323 557 (the '557-patent) which concerns…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Idenix v. Gilead, District Court of Olso, 12-155575TVI-OTIR/01 and 13-170456TVI-OTIR/01, 21 March 2014
July 08, 2015

Both parties’ patents in dispute relate to chemical compounds that are appropriate for use in pharmaceutical drugs, in particular for the treatment of flaviviridae infections such as hepatitis C…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Teva Norway AS v. Astrazeneca Ab, District Court of Olso, 13-189803TVI-OTIR/04, 27 June 2014
February 19, 2015

The Oslo District Court held that the expired Norwegian patent 306452 ("452 Patent") was invalid due to lack of inventive step, which implied that its supplementary protection certificate SPC014 was…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Esomeprazole, Court of Appeal Borgarting 24 January 2014
May 13, 2014

The Court of Appeal held that the esomeprazole salt in Krka's product with an optical purity of 98.8 - 99.5 % e.e. (enantiomeric excess)  was an “optically pure compound” as claimed in AstraZeneca's…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Norway: Liquid Seal Pump, District Court Oslo, 27 January 2014
May 05, 2014

The Oslo District Court held that Jets AS' patent for a liquid seal pump of the helical screw type for use in vacuum drainage systems lacked novelty over one of Jets' own patents. Despite the court’s…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Pharmaq AS v. Intervet International B.V., Court of Appeal, (Borgarting Appelate Court) 22 December 2011
March 13, 2012

The Court of Appeal dismissed Pharmaq's claim that Intervet's patent claiming deposited virus strains and closely related strains sharing genotypic and phenotypic characteristics was invalid and that…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Esomeprazole, Borgarting Court of Appeal (Borgarting lagmannsrett), 16 June 2011
December 03, 2011

The Court of Appeal dismissed Krka's appeal against a decision of the Oslo Court of Enforcement and Execution, which granted AstraZeneca a preliminary injunction preventing Krka from marketing its…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Lars Erik Steinkjer (Wikborg Rein)
Sildenafil, Oslo District Court (Oslo tingrett), 3 August 2011
November 20, 2011

The Court held that Pfizer's Norwegian patent for use of sildenafil (a PDE 5 inhibitor) for treatment of erectile dysfunction was inventive. Although the court did not consider it inventive to test…

  • Read more
1 - 10 of 14 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.