Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

117 results available

search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
Second Medical Use Claims Knockin’ on Dutch Supreme Court’s Door
October 06, 2016

In 2010 the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal took the badge of Swiss type claims from patentees (G 02/08), and since then they cannot use it anymore. Six years later two cases on (infringement of)…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Rien Broekstra (Brinkhof)
The Netherlands: Sun v. Novartis (zoledronic acid), District Court of The Hague, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:14337, 25 November 2015
August 29, 2016

Therapeutic effect of a 2-10mg once yearly dosage regimen is made plausible by an example showing clinical effect of dosage regimens of 0.25, 0.50 and 1mg per three months, 2.0 mg every six months…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Jan Pot (Brinkhof)
Bayer / Sandoz: a step forward for Dutch patent law
June 10, 2016

Claim construction and scope of protection are perhaps the most hotly contested topics in Dutch patent law. Over the last ten years, we have had no less than six Supreme Court decisions dealing with…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Gaëlle Béquet (Brinkhof)
The Netherlands: District Court of The Hague, Hewlett-Packard Company/Digital Revolution B.V., ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:13401, 25 November 2015
May 04, 2016

Increasing the (grounds of the) claim at a late stage of the proceedings in accelerated patent proceedings is contrary to due process of law. The claimed printer cartridge is not novel since no…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Paul Marcelis (Brinkhof)
The Netherlands: ZTE Netherlands B.V. v. Vringo Infrastructure Inc, District Court of The Hague, C/09/481474, 28 October 2015
March 02, 2016

The Dutch part of EP 119 - allegedly essential to the UMTS standard - was found to be obvious over the latest draft of the UMTS standard pre-priority date read in conjunction with a document of a…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Paul Marcelis (Brinkhof)
The Netherlands: Synthon v. Teva, District Court of The Hague, IEF 14885, 22 April 2015
September 16, 2015

The District Court of The Hague invalidated two patents for a lack of inventive step. The patents claimed to solve two separate problems of a known production method for glatiramer acetate. The court…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Jan Pot (Brinkhof)
The Netherlands: Resolution Chemicals v. Shionogi and AstraZeneca, District Court of The Hague, C/09/468395, 15 July 2015
August 05, 2015

The District Court holds that Shionogi’s SPC for rosuvastatin (Crestor®) is invalid in part for added matter and grants a declaration of non-infringement for Resolution Chemicals’ proposed zinc salt…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Rien Broekstra (Brinkhof)
The Netherlands: A v. Arca, District Court of The Hague, C/09/466982, 4 February 2015
July 22, 2015

Competence of the Dutch courts is determined solely based on facts furnished by plaintiff. Jurisdiction for patent entitlement claims is governed by the Protocol on Recognition to the EPC, not by the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Gerben Hartman (Brinkhof)
How low can you go? Thresholds for access to seized evidence in the Netherlands
June 08, 2015

The seizure of evidence is part of every patent litigator’s (pre-trial) arsenal. To some extent this measure is harmonised by the Enforcement Directive (art. 6 Directive 2004/48/EC). However, it does…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Kluwer Patent blogger
‘Behavior Benoît Battistelli is bad for the EPO’s reputation’
March 20, 2015

The behavior of EPO president Benoît Battistelli is bad for the reputation of the European Patent Office and may in the longer term force him to resign. Wouter Pors, IP practitioner of Bird &…

  • Read more
71 - 80 of 117 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • ...
  • 12
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.