Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

117 results available

search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Daan de Lange (Brinkhof) for
Agfa v. Xingraphics, District Court The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), 22 July 2009
July 22, 2009

In these infringement proceedings initiated by Agfa against Xingraphics the Court held Agfa's patent valid and dismissed Xingraphics cross border declaration of non-infringement due to lack of…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Peter Burgers (Brinkhof)
Yeda v. OCNL, Administrative Law Division of the Council of State (Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak Raad van State), 27 May 2009
May 27, 2009

The Administrative Law Division of the Council of State holds that the District Court has rightfully found that the Patent Office was not obligated to issue a Supplementary Protection Certificate for…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Mark van Gardingen (Brinkhof) for
Ratiopharm v. Sepracor, District Court The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), 13 May 2009
May 13, 2009

The Hague District Court nullified Sepracor's patent for compositions for treating allergic disorders using (-) cetirizine (levociterizine) on the basis of lack of inventive step. The Court…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Mark van Gardingen (Brinkhof) for
Generic companies v. Lundbeck, District Court The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), 08 April 2009
April 08, 2009

The District Court of The Hague held that all claims of Lundbeck's escalitopram patent were invalid for lack of inventive step. The District Court nullified the patent and also called the Dutch…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Peter Burgers (Brinkhof)
Ratiopharm et al v. Lundbeck, District Court The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), 08 April 2009
April 08, 2009

The District Court of The Hague held that all claims of Lunbeck’s escalitopram patent were invalid for lack of inventive step. The District Court nullified the patent and also called the Dutch…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Peter Burgers (Brinkhof)
Boston Scientific v. Medinol, Supreme Court (Hoge Raad), 06 March 2009
March 06, 2009

The Dutch Supreme Court stated that the patentee still has an interest in this supreme appeal proceeding after amendment of the patent pursuant to Articles 105a-c EPC 2000 subsequent to coming into…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Peter Burgers (Brinkhof)
Sahajanand v. Angiotech, Court of Appeal The Hague (Gerechtshof Den Haag), 27 January 2009
January 27, 2009

In this judgment the Court of Appeal considers the appellant's claim for invalidation of the patent inadmissible as he did not call the co-proprietor of the patent to join the proceedings. While…

  • Read more
111 - 117 of 117 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 6
  • ...
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.