The refusal to grant a licence for intellectual property (IP) rights can sometimes conflict with competition law. This topic has already been explored in the case law of national courts and the CourtâŠ
On December 23, the Brussels Enterprises Court issued a significant judgment confirming that Samsung Bioepis' notification complies with the legal requirements for relying on the SPC ManufacturingâŠ
In Belgium, descriptive seizures (called âsaisie-descriptionâ in Belgium) are long-standing ex parte procedures to collect evidence of infringement. When a Court grants a saisie request, the saidâŠ
1. Introduction
In an important decision of February 8, 2022 the Brussels Dutch Court of Enterprises (hereafter the âCourt of Enterprisesâ) declared null and void a patent on an âapparatus, systemâŠ
This is a follow-up to Jan-Diederik Lindemansâ post of 18 December 2019 discussing the guidelines on legal privilege during saisie-contrefaçon adopted by the Brussels Bar Association (âBBAâ) on 21âŠ
The Brussels Bar Association (Dutch speaking section, hereafter BBA) recently issues the third guideline since it was created in 1994. In this Guideline the BBA instructs its members how they shouldâŠ
In last month's blog about the recovery of legal costs in Belgian IP enforcement proceedings, it was announced that the Mons Court of Appeal would probably be the first Belgian court to hand down aâŠ
On May 9, 2017, the Dutch-speaking Brussels court of commerce handed down its decision on the merits in the context of an infringement action initiated by Orion and its exclusive licensee NovartisâŠ
On April 3, 2017, the latest decision was handed down in the patent revocation battle between medical device manufacturer Nouvag and Jean Malak, a plastic surgeon specialized in liposuction. ThisâŠ
By Christian Dekoninck, Crowell & Moring
The Brussels Court of Appeal has clarified in a recent decision that a judge, who has previously ruled on a preliminary injunction in a patent case, mayâŠ