Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Patent Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

34 results available

search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Louis Bidaine, Anya Murphy, Philippe Campolini (Stibbe)
Navigating the intersection between IP and competition law: some clarity from the Belgian Supreme Court
March 12, 2025

The refusal to grant a licence for intellectual property (IP) rights can sometimes conflict with competition law. This topic has already been explored in the case law of national courts and the Court…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Kristof Roox (Crowell & Moring)
A Christmas gift for the biosimilar industry: Landmark judgment in SPC Manufacturing Waiver case
December 31, 2024

On December 23, the Brussels Enterprises Court issued a significant judgment confirming that Samsung Bioepis' notification complies with the legal requirements for relying on the SPC Manufacturing…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Louis Bidaine, Anya Murphy (Stibbe), Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
What is the fate of evidence already collected during a saisie if the authorisation to perform it is later annulled ?
April 25, 2024

In Belgium, descriptive seizures (called “saisie-description” in Belgium) are long-standing ex parte procedures to collect evidence of infringement. When a Court grants a saisie request, the said…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Christopher Dumont (Crowell)
Restoration of priority rights under scrutiny
May 18, 2022

1. Introduction In an important decision of February 8, 2022 the Brussels Dutch Court of Enterprises (hereafter the “Court of Enterprises”) declared null and void a patent on an “apparatus, system…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Matteo Mariano (Crowell & Moring)
Legal privilege during saisie-contrefaçon in Belgium – a follow-up
May 04, 2020

This is a follow-up to Jan-Diederik Lindemans’ post of 18 December 2019 discussing the guidelines on legal privilege during saisie-contrefaçon adopted by the Brussels Bar Association (‘BBA’) on 21…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Jan-Diederik Lindemans (Crowell & Moring)
Brussels Bar Association issues rules on legal privilege during <i>saisie contrefaçon</i>
December 18, 2019

The Brussels Bar Association (Dutch speaking section, hereafter BBA) recently issues the third guideline since it was created in 1994. In this Guideline the BBA instructs its members how they should…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Jan-Diederik Lindemans (Crowell & Moring)
Recovering lawyers’ fees in Belgium: Antwerp court beats Mons court to first substantive ruling
May 24, 2017

In last month's blog about the recovery of legal costs in Belgian IP enforcement proceedings, it was announced that the Mons Court of Appeal would probably be the first Belgian court to hand down a…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Jurgen Figys (Crowell & Moring LLP)
Orion’s Three-In-One Formulation Patent for Entacapone, Levodopa and Carbidopa Declared Null by the Belgian Courts
May 22, 2017

On May 9, 2017, the Dutch-speaking Brussels court of commerce handed down its decision on the merits in the context of an infringement action initiated by Orion and its exclusive licensee Novartis…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Jan-Diederik Lindemans (Crowell & Moring)
First Belgian ruling on costs in patent proceedings post United Video Properties/Telnet
May 04, 2017

On April 3, 2017, the latest decision was handed down in the patent revocation battle between medical device manufacturer Nouvag and Jean Malak, a plastic surgeon specialized in liposuction. This…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder-16-9.jpg
Kristof Roox (Crowell & Moring)
Brussels Court of Appeal refuses to recuse a judge deciding on the merits, who had previously decided on a PI request
June 18, 2015

By Christian Dekoninck, Crowell & Moring The Brussels Court of Appeal has clarified in a recent decision that a judge, who has previously ruled on a preliminary injunction in a patent case, may…

  • Read more
1 - 10 of 34 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • About Kluwer Patent Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.