Patent Case: Tomra v. Kiremko, The Netherlands

search-result-placeholder.jpg

The Court confirmed that a District court, not specialised in patent matters, does have relative jurisdiction to decide a motion to produce exhibits for determining patent infringement. In order to positively decide a motion to produce exhibits, (threat of) infringement should be made plausible, but the threshold for plausibility is relatively low. Further, technical details of products that are on the market may still be considered to be trade secrets.

Case number: NL 17.11739

Case date: 02 November 2018

Court: District Court of Midden-Nederland

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community! Contact Editorial Guidelines
Image
AI Assistant on Kluwer IP Law's Manual IP
Image
Whitepaper

Book Ad List

Books
book1
Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2024 Edition
Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge
€105.00
AIPPI
Experimental Use and Bolar Exemptions
David Gilat, Charles A. Boulakia, Daphné Derouane & Ralph Nack
€190.00
book2
Annotated PCT
Malte Köllner
€160.00