Patent case: Shamoon v. Resideo Technologies, Inc., USA

search-result-placeholder.jpg

There was no error in an inter partes review decision finding obviousness in a communication system patent because the board properly relied on materials in the record in its claim construction and obviousness analysis.

An inventor of a communication system failed to show any error in an IPR proceeding which found his invention obvious, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held. The board’s claim construction and motivation to combine analysis were supported by the record (Shamoon v. Resideo Technologies, Inc., August 8, 2023, Newman, P.).

Case date: 08 August 2023

Case number: No. 21-1813

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community! Contact Editorial Guidelines
Image
AI Assistant on Kluwer IP Law's Manual IP
Image
Whitepaper

Book Ad List

Books
book1
Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2024 Edition
Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge
€105.00
AIPPI
Experimental Use and Bolar Exemptions
David Gilat, Charles A. Boulakia, Daphné Derouane & Ralph Nack
€190.00
book2
Annotated PCT
Malte Köllner
€160.00