Patent case: NanoString Technologies vs. 10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College, UPC

search-result-placeholder.jpg

In accordance with the principles of procedural economy and cost efficiency as well as a fair balance between the legitimate interests of the parties, which must be considered in the interpretation of the Rules of Procedure pursuant to Article 41(3) UPCA, the proceedings are not required to be stayed under Rule 311.1, first sentence RoP, if a party is declared insolvent only after the oral proceedings have concluded and the dispute is ready for a decision.

Case date: 26 February 2024

Case number: CoA 335/20236653/2024576355/20236601/2024

Court: UPC Court of Appeal, Luxembourg

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law

Comments (1)
Your email address will not be published.
default-avatar.png
Joris Verhelst
March 6, 2024 AT 1:43 PM

PDF of the decision is here: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/6601-Anordnung%20-%20AussetzungEN.final_.pdf

Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community! Contact Editorial Guidelines