Medeva v. Comptroller, European Court of Justice, 24 November 2011

search-result-placeholder.jpg

The Court of Justice clarified the requirements for grant of an SPC under Articles 3(a) and 3(b) of the SPC Regulation. According to the Court, on the basis of Article 3(a) an SPC cannot be granted for active ingredients not specified in the wording of the claims of the basic patent. With reference to Article 3(b), the Court held that an SPC can be granted for a combination of two active ingredients that correspond to those specified in the wording of the claims of the basic patent even if the medicinal product for which the marketing authorisation is submitted in support of the application for the SPC additionally contains other active ingredients.

Click here for the full text of this case. A summary of this case will be posted on http://www.KluwerIPCases.com.

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community! Contact Editorial Guidelines
Image
AI Assistant on Kluwer IP Law's Manual IP
Image
Whitepaper

Book Ad List

Books
book1
Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2024 Edition
Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge
€105.00
AIPPI
Experimental Use and Bolar Exemptions
David Gilat, Charles A. Boulakia, Daphné Derouane & Ralph Nack
€190.00
book2
Annotated PCT
Malte Köllner
€160.00