Giemme vs. Ciemmecalabria, Supreme Court (Corte Suprema di Cassazione), 12 June 2012
August 9, 2012
The Supreme Court revoked claims 1 to 4, and found claim 5 to be novel and inventive but not infringed, because the result of defendant's machine was not obtained by the claimed means. The court sanctioned the appeal court's decision that the doctrine of equivalence could not be applied.
Click here for the full text of this case.
A summary of this case will be posted on http://www.KluwerIPCases.com
Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community!
Contact Editorial Guidelines
