Germany: Quetiapin, Federal Court of Justice of Germany, X ZR 41/13, 13 January 2015

search-result-placeholder.jpg

When defining the technical problem underlying an invention, it may not simply be assumed that the person skilled in the art needed to address a particular problem. On the contrary, the technical problem must be formulated so generally and neutrally that the question as to which incentives a person skilled in the art obtained from the state of art, arises only when examining inventive step.

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community! Contact Editorial Guidelines
Image
AI Assistant on Kluwer IP Law's Manual IP
Image
Whitepaper

Book Ad List

Books
book1
Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2024 Edition
Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge
€105.00
AIPPI
Experimental Use and Bolar Exemptions
David Gilat, Charles A. Boulakia, Daphné Derouane & Ralph Nack
€190.00
book2
Annotated PCT
Malte Köllner
€160.00