Estonia ratifies Unified Patent Court Agreement
August 2, 2017
Estonia has ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement. According to the website of the European Council, it completed the ratification formalities on 1 August 2017.
Ratification by 13 UPC member states, including the United Kingdom and Germany, is necessary in order for the Unitary Patent system to launch. The UK and Germany were expected to complete the process this month at the latest, but this has been delayed by the Brexit and the general elections in the UK and by an unexpected and mysterious constitutional complaint in Germany. Instead of starting in December 2017, the UPC Preparatory Committee now expects the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court to begin functioning in the first half of 2018.
Another issue is the Protocol on Provisional Application (PPA), which allows for some parts of the UPCA to be applied early. In the provisional period, judges will be appointed and other practical preparations completed. Support from 13 member states whose parliaments have ratified the UPCA, is required before the provisional period can begin. As Alexander Ramsay, chairman of the UPC Preparatory Committee announced last June: ‘even considering Estonia and the UK, three additional approvals of the PPA, including Germany, are necessary in order for the preparations to be completed for this final phase (provisional application period).’
It isn’t clear whether Estonia has also given its consent to the PPA. According to a Bristows report it has. Still, on the website of the EU Council, Estonia isn’t mentioned as one of the states that have given their support to the PPA. (UPDATE: Since the publication of this blogpost the EU Council's website has been updated to include Estonia, which apparently notified its consent to the start of the PPA in July)
Ireland is one of the few UP member states in which a referendum is required as part of the ratification procedure. Denmark held such referendum in 2014.
For regular updates on the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court, subscribe to this blog and the free Kluwer IP Law Newsletter.
Elli Phant
Interesting to see that reports on the same topic are now popping up on Bristows' UPC website and here almost in parallel, Kluwer making reference to the Bristows piece. The postings seem to be well coordinated. Still missing is a similar contribution on the IPkat (usually by the Bristows people in charge there), but I'm sure we will see that soon.
Thierry
Good to see to that the preparations are going on despite the several uncertainties involved. Maybe all the current worries will in the end turn out to have been nothing more than a tempest in a teapot so that the reported efforts will allow the UPC to come to life without too much delay.