Dependent Claims, Supreme Court of Justice of Austria, 27 August 2013
February 26, 2014
1. Also in case a dependent claim is patentable on its own, fulfillment of all features of both the main claim and the dependent claim is required for infringement.
2. The scope of a patent is defined by its claims; the prosecution file may only be considered for interpretation if there are contradictions between the claims, the description and/or the drawings.
The full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Become a contributor!
Interested in contributing? Submit your proposal for a blog post now and become a part of our legal community!
Contact Editorial Guidelines