USA: Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. AereoKiller, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 15-56420, 21 March 2017

search-result-placeholder.jpg

A Pasadena, California, district court ruling that FilmOn X, LLC, was a "cable system" and thus eligible for compulsory licenses under the Copyright Act has been reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco. In a ruling in favor of broadcasters such as Fox Television Stations, Inc., the court held that, based on guidance from the Copyright Office, a service that captures copyrighted works broadcast over the air, and then retransmits them to paying subscribers over the Internet without the consent of the copyright holders, is not a "cable system" eligible for a compulsory license. Therefore, streaming television service provider FilmOn X, LLC, was not entitled to a compulsory license under Section 111 of the Copyright Act (Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. AereoKiller, LLC, March 21, 2017, O’Scannlain, D.).

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Image
ESG

Number 1 in Top 40 Copyright Blogs!

Image
feedspot

Book Ad List

Books
AIPPI
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright
Guillaume Henry and Sanna Wolk
€125.00
book1
The EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: A Commentary
Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan, Nikolaus Forgó, & Peggy Valcke
€285.00