Lithuania: Association LATGA & B.V. v Hesona & others, Court of Appeal of Lithuania, 2A-6-183/2015, 29 May 2015

judge hammer

The court of appeals held that as there was no evidence that the Defendants had gained any profit from a public display of sculptures, they were not liable to pay royalties in respect of the exhibition.  However, the defendants were ordered to discontinue sales of products bearing pictures of the copyright sculptures as this activity was of a commercial nature.

In relation to the claim for moral damages, since the works themselves had not been damaged and the use on sweet boxes or postcards did not affect the reputation of the authors, the court of appeals rejected the request to compensate by way of moral damages.

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law

 

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Image
ESG

Number 1 in Top 40 Copyright Blogs!

Image
feedspot

Book Ad List

Books
AIPPI
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright
Guillaume Henry and Sanna Wolk
€125.00
book1
The EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: A Commentary
Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan, Nikolaus Forgó, & Peggy Valcke
€285.00