Allen v. Bloomsbury Publishing & Murray, Court of Appeal Civil Division (Court of Appeal Civil Division), 18 March 2011

Law

Kitchin J granted an order for security for costs under rule 24.6 CPR against the claimant in a copyright infringement case. While remaining sensitive to the right of access to the court of the claimant and acknowledging that security for costs should only rarely be ordered solely where the case appears weak, the judge considered an order necessary, the claimant being a nominal claimant (satisfying rule 25.13(2)(f)), with poor prospects of success and whose behaviour demonstrated a want of good faith.

The full summary of this case has been posted on Kluwer IP Law.

Comments (0)
Your email address will not be published.
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published.
Clear all
Image
ESG

Number 1 in Top 40 Copyright Blogs!

Image
feedspot

Book Ad List

Books
AIPPI
Artificial Intelligence and Copyright
Guillaume Henry and Sanna Wolk
€125.00
book1
The EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: A Commentary
Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan, Nikolaus Forgó, & Peggy Valcke
€285.00