Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo Kluwer Arbitration Blog
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Arbitration Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Affiliate
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

78 results available

search-result-placeholder.jpg
Jawad Ahmad (Mayer Brown LLP)
Should Court Actions Arising Out of International Arbitration Disputes Be Heard At the Singapore International Commercial Court?
July 17, 2015

and Paul Tan, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Short answer: Yes for some actions, but not all. Here is why. The Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) was launched in January 2015 and…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Eugene Tan (Clyde and Co), Rupert Coldwell (Clyde & Co.) for Clyde & Co.
Another (Unsuccessful) Challenge to the Finality of Interim Arbitral Awards in Singapore and Enforcing DAB Decisions on International Projects under FIDIC
June 15, 2015

Introduction As reported by Clyde & Co for the Kluwer Arbitration Blog on 12 January 2015, the Singapore High Court released its decision in PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Gary B. Born, Jonathan Lim (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP) for WilmerHale
AQZ v ARA: Singapore High Court Upholds Award Made under SIAC Expedited Procedure
March 09, 2015

The availability of expedited procedures providing for fast-track arbitration is by now commonplace under many modern institutional rules; however, the effectiveness of these mechanisms lies…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Kelvin Poon (Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP)
Singapore Court Reviews Investment Arbitral Tribunal’s Decision On Jurisdiction: What Standard Should Apply As to Evidence?
February 04, 2015

and Paul Tan, Jawad Ahmad and Victor Steinmetz, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP In what marks the first time where a Singapore court reviews an investment arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction, the High…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Gitta Satryani, Emmanuel Chua (Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) for HSF Kramer
The Singapore International Commercial Court: Friend or Foe to International Arbitration in Singapore?
January 14, 2015

At the opening of the legal year in Singapore on 5 January 2015, the Singapore International Commercial Court ("SICC") was officially launched. In the words of Chief Justice Menon, the SICC is…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Eugene Tan (Clyde and Co), Rupert Coldwell (Clyde & Co.) for Clyde & Co.
The Finality of Interim Arbitral Awards in Singapore – How ‘Final’ is ‘Final’?
January 12, 2015

Singapore's longstanding reputation as an arbitration friendly jurisdiction was reinforced in 2010 with the legislature's adoption of the 2006 amendments to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Prakash Pillai (Clyde and Co), Umer Akram Chaudhry (Legaleidescope) for Clyde & Co.
The Singapore Approach to Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards
December 24, 2014

International arbitration must of necessity rely on the courts to uphold and enforce arbitral awards and to support the arbitral process. In words of Professor Jan Paulsson, "the great paradox of…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Edward Foyle (Hogan Lovells) for Hogan Lovells
Challenging Arbitral Awards in Singapore
November 26, 2014

The Singapore courts have a well-earned reputation for supporting arbitration proceedings and favouring minimal curial intervention. That reputation has been enhanced by a number of recent decisions…

  • Read more
71 - 78 of 78 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • About Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: International Arbitration & Mediation
    Wolters Kluwer: International Arbitration & Mediation
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

©2025 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.